I had an exciting moment this evening when I came home and checked my blog stats... I've reached 1000 views!! A little over a thousand now, actually.
So, I thought I'd take the time to a) be super stoked, and b) thank all the loyal friends, enemies, and strangers who have and/or continue to read my blog. This wouldn't be possible without you. Duh.
Thank you. You're awesome and I'm honoured and that's great.
Love.
Ella xxx
Sunday, February 13, 2011
Saturday, February 12, 2011
The Theatre Obligation Scale. By Amy Jephta.
Facebook article of the day. Of the week. Hell, it may even be of my life. I don't know. You don't know. So just read it. Especially if you're a "theatre-goer" (whatever that constitutes). It's brilliant.
Going to the theatre can be annoying.
Sure, I make theatre. Sure, I love it when people come to my shows.
But man, dragging ones ass out the door can be a real pain.
How does answer the to-see-or-not-to-see question? What if I really, really don't want to? What if I'd rather sit on the couch with a tube of Pringles and paint my toenails? I'd never get out then. If left to my own devices, I'd sit and watch movies and my friends (both of them) would hate me.
So, I hereby present The Theatre Obligation Scale. A custom made tool for determining whether or not you should go see a play tonight. Just read each question and score accordingly. Award yourself a plus (+) or minus (-) point as indicated.
It beats having to make up excuses or conveniently "forgetting". Don't fight the facts. Just roll with it.
QUESTIONS:
1. Are you a personal friend of anyone in the show? This includes "yes, I've known them for 10 years" or "yes, I slept with them in undergrad". Because that's pretty personal. (+1 for each person)
2. Have you previously worked with anyone involved in the show? Any and all forms of work qualify. (+1 for each person)
3. Is there a chance that in the future you will need to either a) work with or b) request favours from anyone in the show? This includes "please can I borrow your coffee table" and please will you act for free". (+1 for each person)
4. Did you make an unwitting promise that you would see the show? Anything along the lines of "oh okay, I'll definitely check it out" qualifies. If you said "uh huh", "sure", "yes", "mmkay", "maybe" or "I'll see", that also qualifies. (+1)
5. Will it be educationally enriching for you to attend said show? As in, will you learn something you didn't know about a historical event, or a period in human history, or a topic not on Wikipedia? (+1)
6. Have you heard a favorable review from a critic or a mouth that you respect? Not applicable is "yeah, it was cool" or anything resembling. (+1)
7. Will there be snacks, food, wine, or any manner of edible things on sticks? (+2)
8. Will you be overwhelmed with guilt when asked "hey, why didn't you come see my show" during a chance encounter in Spar? (+1)
9. Have the person/persons involved been to more than 50% of your shows? People who beg for comps excluded. (+1)
10. Do you respect or have you enjoyed the past work of someone in the show (+1 for each person)
11. Does it have a bad title? (-1)
12. Did you cringe when reading the synopsis and/or press release? (-1)
13. Is there nudity from an undesirable source? (-1) For nudity from desirable source, (+1)
14. Are the tickets overpriced? Overpriced being "I could treat myself to a three course meal for that amount". (-1)
15. Is there a sports event of mild to strong significance happening simultaneously? (-1)
16. Does the running time exceed 1h30 mins? (-1/2 point for every half hour exceeded)
17. Does the play require you to move from location to location? (-1/2 point for every move, excluding foyer to seat)
18. Is it written by Athol Fugard? (-2)
19. Did the poster cause you to dry retch? (-1)
20. Have you been continually spammed via email, sms, Facebook or direct confrontation? (-1/2 point for every spam crime exceeding 3 pieces)
Now, to the scoreboard!
1 - 5 points = Stay home. Have a bagel. Hell, go to bed at 8pm. Your conscience does not deserve to be wracked with guilt.
6 points = You should take a shower and seriously contemplate leaving the house, at the very least.
7 - 9 points = Go. Now. Book a ticket and go. Refusal to adhere makes you a Bad Person.
11+ points = There are no options in this matter. If you choose to pass, you will lie awake at night with shame nibbling at the edges of your delinquent brain. When you die, no one will attend your funeral. Even if they agreed to "definitely check it out".
End.
![]() |
An honest opinion openly expressed. |
How much did you enjoy working out your score? Exactly.
Thank you, Amy.
Labels:
amy jephta,
fb status,
funny,
honest,
laugh,
obligation,
review,
theatre,
theatre-goer,
writing
Black Swan.
I have been hesitant to write this post. Not so much hesitant as I've been overwhelmed at the idea. But I feel inspired to write and I feel inspired by her and I feel strongly about this film. So, I'm going to do it. For all that feeling in me.
I'll start with the ending. As the credits ominously, slowly flashed their way on and off the bright white screen with the music all gone but for the cruel clapping applause from what felt like the audience I was sitting in, I felt the most overwhelming sense of defeat.... submergence... speechlessness... that has ever flooded my soul. And it was purely induced by the brilliance of the art that is my passion. Film.
I can't possibly do her justice - Natalie Portman - or even him - Vincent Cassel - or the director - Darren Aronoffsky (who I suspected had directed 'Requiem for a Dream' and later found out had, indeed, done so). I was even mighty impressed by and even relieved at the transformation and hatching that came from Mila Kunis (who also played the kid in Gia). When asked about the notorious film, Black Swan, I will always try to describe my utmost respect for and disbelief at the performance that Natalie Portman gives. Having rigorously trained for up to a year to be a convincing prima ballerina and having managed to keep up being a phenomenal, well-tuned, "perfect" (there's a wonderful play on different conceptions of perfection in art in the film) actress, she pulls off a role that I think could easily have been played boring, rigid, anal and, as the plot unfolds, over-sexual. But not for Natalie. No. Natalie became something I've never seen before. In any actor. Sorry, Angelina.
So far, the only negativity I've heard with regards to this masterpiece of a film has been from ballerinas and their teachers, claiming that it "mis-portrays the world of Ballet and ballet companies", it is "clearly" made by someone who "hasn't researched the life of ballerinas enough", and that it is a gross "stereotype" based on the drugs, sex, and psychology of "American dance companies".
Well, firstly, it is a story set in America, it is a story about a ballerina who experiences situations of drugs, sex and psychopathic, lunatic craziness, AND our ballerina is a member of a dance company. Boom.
Secondly, I doubt the aforementioned critic-ballerinas have researched into the world of film-making, story-telling and interpretation for film. Perhaps the director's intention was to comment on the 'stereotype' of American dance companies and that the negative lumpy bits therein are the exact parts he had hoped to highlight (perhaps even directly aimed at these critic-ballerinas). I don't know Darren and I don't know ballet. But I do believe that this film is something horrific and terrific and fantastic and just plain brilliant and that it deserves the credit that I feel it has earned itself.
Hey, that's just me. NOT. I've seen a good 20 facebook status's about this film - all positive. And I haven't even reached the thousand-friends mark yet.
Over-and-out.
I'll start with the ending. As the credits ominously, slowly flashed their way on and off the bright white screen with the music all gone but for the cruel clapping applause from what felt like the audience I was sitting in, I felt the most overwhelming sense of defeat.... submergence... speechlessness... that has ever flooded my soul. And it was purely induced by the brilliance of the art that is my passion. Film.
I can't possibly do her justice - Natalie Portman - or even him - Vincent Cassel - or the director - Darren Aronoffsky (who I suspected had directed 'Requiem for a Dream' and later found out had, indeed, done so). I was even mighty impressed by and even relieved at the transformation and hatching that came from Mila Kunis (who also played the kid in Gia). When asked about the notorious film, Black Swan, I will always try to describe my utmost respect for and disbelief at the performance that Natalie Portman gives. Having rigorously trained for up to a year to be a convincing prima ballerina and having managed to keep up being a phenomenal, well-tuned, "perfect" (there's a wonderful play on different conceptions of perfection in art in the film) actress, she pulls off a role that I think could easily have been played boring, rigid, anal and, as the plot unfolds, over-sexual. But not for Natalie. No. Natalie became something I've never seen before. In any actor. Sorry, Angelina.
So far, the only negativity I've heard with regards to this masterpiece of a film has been from ballerinas and their teachers, claiming that it "mis-portrays the world of Ballet and ballet companies", it is "clearly" made by someone who "hasn't researched the life of ballerinas enough", and that it is a gross "stereotype" based on the drugs, sex, and psychology of "American dance companies".
Well, firstly, it is a story set in America, it is a story about a ballerina who experiences situations of drugs, sex and psychopathic, lunatic craziness, AND our ballerina is a member of a dance company. Boom.
Secondly, I doubt the aforementioned critic-ballerinas have researched into the world of film-making, story-telling and interpretation for film. Perhaps the director's intention was to comment on the 'stereotype' of American dance companies and that the negative lumpy bits therein are the exact parts he had hoped to highlight (perhaps even directly aimed at these critic-ballerinas). I don't know Darren and I don't know ballet. But I do believe that this film is something horrific and terrific and fantastic and just plain brilliant and that it deserves the credit that I feel it has earned itself.
Hey, that's just me. NOT. I've seen a good 20 facebook status's about this film - all positive. And I haven't even reached the thousand-friends mark yet.
Over-and-out.
Friday, February 11, 2011
Oliver Booth --> Wildcard WKND!
Any UCT student can audition. No matter what kind of funny you are, we want to see it!
Booya.
Booya.
Good Morning, Good People.
Wishing everyone a fantastic Friday filled with fun and fortune. Look at me - I'm an allitorator. :)
Today I have a three-hour voice workshop and then our school meeting which kicks off the fun for this year. So my day will hopefully be fantastic, fun and fortune-filled. Maybe not. But I'm willing it to be so.
May the force be with you!
Ella
Today I have a three-hour voice workshop and then our school meeting which kicks off the fun for this year. So my day will hopefully be fantastic, fun and fortune-filled. Maybe not. But I'm willing it to be so.
May the force be with you!
Ella
Thursday, February 10, 2011
Deuling Cellists.
Facebook Post of the day today is by Jesse Wentzel... I love the music, and the video is really fun and pacey and the conviction that both of the cellists express is hilarious. Proves my theory that muso's often make for good actors - or, at least, good muso's often make for better actors than non-muso's could. Make sense?
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
Afterthought.
Oh, quick one:
Today I saw something that bothered me. Picture this:
Ugly yellow poster with kak font advertising for students to join their "communist community" society.
They allegedly wish to aid and include into our society the following groups: (I quote)
I repeat: "... and other DISABILITIES."
No joke.
Today I saw something that bothered me. Picture this:
Ugly yellow poster with kak font advertising for students to join their "communist community" society.
They allegedly wish to aid and include into our society the following groups: (I quote)
People of all races, genders, religions, sexual orientations and other disabilities.
I repeat: "... and other DISABILITIES."
No joke.
Lost.
Tonight I feel a little bit lost. And I'm not sure why. Perhaps because my day today felt unproductive and - although it was a beautiful day and I was in a good mood all the way through and I even took my pants off and swam - it just felt like a typical hot-and-bothered day and that's probably why I didn't like it that much. Conclusion --> way to find solution to "something's missing" --> start blog --> new post --> stream of consciousness writing.
I feel better already.
![]() |
(Me feeling better already) |
I feel like I'm having a bit of a writers' block. I keep starting to want to write about something and then changing my mind... or whatever's going through my mind is boring me. Haha. What a depressing thought.
I've figured something out. I want to talk about Valentine's day. It's coming up. It's big, fat, red and squidgy. etc. I get that people hate on it for being a money-making scheme. And I get that others blissfully swear by it as one of the most important days in their relationships - right up there with their "month-a-versaries". And I tried to figure out which of the two Valentine's Day categories I fall under. I will admit to being a rather corny hopeless romantic. But I'm also not one for ignorance-is-bliss...
So, my conclusion is that those who hate on the love day for the fact that it chews at their wallets - chill out and enjoy it. If you're a dude, she'll be pissed if you don't buy her something and if you do, you might get lucky and get some yourself. And if you're a chick... well, you know you want to. As for the blind love maniacs, good for you, just don't let resentment come into play when you can't pay for your own whatever it is you want or need and stuff.
So, from me, the hopeless romantic who doesn't want to spend too much this Valentine's Day - happy loving, happy saving and happy matress-dancin' ;)
Au Revoir
x
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Mu-Barack
I'm not an activist enough to make any sort of bold statements about the president of America, Egypt, or even Zimbabwe. But the thought just crossed my mind that:
Robert MUgabe and BARACK Obama = Hosni MUBARAK.
I'm just saying.
Robert MUgabe and BARACK Obama = Hosni MUBARAK.
I'm just saying.
+
=
?
Civil Twilight.
Local band. International music. That's cool.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)